Print Email
E-mail This Page

Please wait... loading

Documents

The documents collection houses a library of available PJM Interconnection materials. Because of the requirements for formatting or viewing the material on the Web site, the documents may not be exact reproductions of the originals.

Highlights
Types of Agreements:  PJM forms agreements with stakeholders to ensure the reliability of the electric power grid. These agreements are formed with PJM members, independent system operators (ISOs) and other regional transmission organizations (RTOs), and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and NERC.
Manuals:  The PJM manuals are the administrative, planning, operating and accounting procedures of the PJM Interconnection.
Search Results
 Keyword:
 Category:
 From: 
To: 
 
Access this content via a news reader
Access this content via a news readerAccess this content via a handheld mobile device
 Author      Date      Document    
PJM 03.10.2010 Docket No. ER10-713-000 pdfPDF
On March 10, 2010, PJM and Progress Energy Carolinas filed an Answer in response to the Motion to Intervene and Comments of the Independent Market Monitor for PJM in Docket No. ER10-713-000.
PJM 03.10.2010 Docket No. ES10-26-000 pdfPDF
On March 10, 2010, IN Docket No. ES10-26-000, PJM made a supplemental filing to its February 5, 2010 application for an order authorizing the issuance of securities.
PJM 03.08.2010 Docket No. EL10-45-000 (Part 2) pdfPDF
On March 8, 2010, MISO filed a complaint against PJM, in Docket No. EL10-45-000, alleging that PJM is violation of the JOA because PJM allegedly demanded resettlement of amounts related to the MISO’s use of substitute flowgates in the market-to-market processes under the JOA. PJM believes that the use of substitute flowgates is a violation of the JOA. MISO asks the Commission to order PJM to acknowledge the use of an RCF as a substitute flowgate under the JOA. This complaint also alleges that PJM failed to initiate market-to-market coordination on a bound RCF in violation of the JOA. MISO claims that it is owed approximately $5,000,000 as a result.
Midwest ISO 03.08.2010 Docket No. EL10-45-000 (Part 1) pdfPDF
On March 8, 2010, MISO filed a complaint against PJM, in Docket No. EL10-45-000, alleging that PJM is violation of the JOA because PJM allegedly demanded resettlement of amounts related to the MISO’s use of substitute flowgates in the market-to-market processes under the JOA. PJM believes that the use of substitute flowgates is a violation of the JOA. MISO asks the Commission to order PJM to acknowledge the use of an RCF as a substitute flowgate under the JOA. This complaint also alleges that PJM failed to initiate market-to-market coordination on a bound RCF in violation of the JOA. MISO claims that it is owed approximately $5,000,000 as a result.
Midwest ISO 03.08.2010 Docket No. EL10-46-000 pdfPDF
On March 8, 2010, MISO filed a complaint against PJM in Docket No. EL10-46-000. This complaint relates to PJM’s errors in market flow calculations under the MISO PJM JOA during the period 2005 to 2009. For the 2007 to 2009 period, MISO asks for damages in the amount of $74,534,067, including interest. For the 2005 to 2007 period, MISO admits that there is insufficient information for an accurate calculation of the underpayments but claims nonetheless that $65,040,954 plus interest is due. Thus, MISO seeks in this complaint $130,000,000 plus interest for the alleged under payments. MISO also disputes PJM’s defenses which were raised in the context of the dispute resolution process under the JOA.
PJM 03.01.2010 Docket No. EL08-14-xxx pdfPDF
On March 1, 2010, in Docket No. EL08-14-xxx, PJM submitted, in compliance with the Commission’s Order of September 17, 2009, a Report of Refund. The refunds are directed to distribute marginal line loss surplus payments to those customers who were found to have contributed to the fixed costs of the transmission system through payments and, entitled to a refund allocation of the surplus of those payments.
PJM 02.26.2010 Docket No. ER10-343-000 pdfPDF
On February 26, 2010, PJM submitted to the Commission in Docket No. ER10-343-000 a motion for an extension of time to submit a compliance filing regarding the conditionally accepted interconnection service agreement among PJM, Worcester County Renewable Energy, LLC an Delmarva Power and Light Company. The Commission directed that a revised ISA be filed to address power factor requirements for the indirectly interconnected small generator.
PJM 02.22.2010 Docket No. EL08-14-000 pdfPDF
On February 22, 2010, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., filed a Motion to Dismiss and Answer to a complaint filed February 1, 2010 with the Commission by EPIC Merchant Energy NJ/PA, SESCO Enterprises, L.L.C., and Coaltrain Energy, LP, challenging PJM's allocation of transmission line loss charges and distribution of transmission line loss charge surpluses.
  More >>